I was speaking to friends a few days back, when someone brought up the topic of filmstar Chiranjeevi’s imminent entry into politics. The debate was if Chiranjeevi had it in him to be able to emulate the likes of NTR in Andhra or MGR and Jayalalitha in Tamil Nadu. To which, one of my friends remarked that it was the fanaticism towards filmstars, combined with immaturity and a total lack of political acumen that makes the people in the southern states of our country turn filmstars into political bigshots.
While this feeling of derision seems to be the notion amongst most Indians, a closer look at these two states, their history and their socio-political scenario will actually make you realize how logically inconsistent it is. Both AP and TN are remarkably progressive states and also form a considerable chunk of India’s software and biotech industries. Let’s not forget that the top brass management of 3 of our top 4 software firms consist of people who hail from the south! Why then, will the people of these states act naive while electing their leaders! What’s wrong with the South!!
Let us take a brief look at the filmstar-turned-chief ministers we have had till date down south, and their rise in politics. That should help us find an answer to our question.
Tamil Nadu (or the Madras Presidency as it was then called) had always had important Congress leaders, C. Rajagopalachari or Rajaji (Independent India’s first Indian Governor-General) probably being the most well known of them all. Another popular leader and an ex-Congressman E.V. Ramasamy Naicker or Periyar as he was fondly called, had started a “Self Respect Movement” and had formed the Dravidar Kazhagam, aimed at achieving an egalitarian society, one where the backward classes had equal human rights. But it had not become a political force, until the genius of Annadurai liked the movement to a Dravidian entity and broadened its base. This was also the time when the state was witnessing protests against the Centre’s decision to make Hindi the sole National Language of India, and a compulsory subject in schools. After Annadurai broke away from Periyar’s DK and formed his own Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), he got two very useful allies in this struggle – film writer M. Karunanidhi and the charismatic actor MGR. Cinema has always been a very potent medium, and film heroes all over the world making a strong impact on people isn’t very difficult to comprehend. So when MGR started spreading the message of DMK through his films like Anbe Vaa, he became the face of the Dravidian Movement. Although he later broke away to form a separate All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) after differences with the then chief minister Karunanidhi, he had already garnered the support of the masses, enough to make him win every election till his death in 1987. His legacy was later inherited by another filmstar, Jayalalitha.
To be noted at this juncture is the fact that it was Annadurai’s Dravidian politics that had created the platform for MGR to form a party which people could associate with. Otherwise, a Malayali Menon born in Sri Lanka had little chance of ruling a state like TN.
Now we come to NTR, another charismatic filmstar who ruled Telugu cinema for decades, alongwith other stalwarts like Akkineni Nageswara Rao. In the early 1980s, there already was significant discontent among the masses, against the Congress government, on accounts of unemployment, corruption and general anti-incumbency. And then came the unfortunate incident of chief minister Anjaiah being publicly humiliated at the Hyderabad airport by the then General Secretary of Congress, a certain Rajiv Gandhi! The incident hurt the pride of Telugus across the state. NTR timed his move well, floated the Telugu Desam Party and went into the elections 9 months later with a call for restoring Telugu “Atma Gauravam” (self-pride). He won a landslide and became the CM.
However, NTR’s political career shows us that even a film megastar like him couldn’t win elections just with the sheer power of stardom. In his first term as CM, he got into saffron robes and tried ruling the state ideologically, leading to disastrous consequences. He ended up losing the elections in 1989.
The filmstar-to-CM stories of both MGR and NTR have a very common theme. The key point in both the stories is the fact that they had serious social and political agenda, and not mere star status, that helped them rise in politics. Yes the filmstar status helped in getting them nearer to the masses, but the people were voting for their agenda more than their stardom. This brings us to an important question: why only TN and AP, why don’t filmstars have the same influence in other states?
Well, for that to happen what is essential is a very strong sense of distinct identity or shared history with the star. That is probably why people across the Hindi speaking belt of India will find it tough getting emotionally involved with a Hindi film star. Not even with someone as larger-than-life as Amitabh Bachchan.
Among the other states, Gujarat and Orissa hardly have film inustries of note and the Marathi film industry has been completely overshadowed by Bombay. West Bengal probably was our best bet to become another TN. Immense self pride, a desire for egalitarian society and a strong sense of history, the state had everything that it needed. But just as the Dravidian parties did in the south, communists filled up the vacuum in WB. Even then, had megastar Uttam Kumar chosen to be the face of the non-Congress group, WB too could have had its own filmstar CM! Similar to WB, the Akali Dal moved into power in Punjab, almost at the same time. And Kerala went the WB way, the communists there too seized the opportunity to gain power.
The only other Dravidian state, Karnataka, also had a larger-than-life filmstar in Dr. Rajkumar. But throughout his life he maintained a safe distance from the power game, thus “depriving” the Kannadigas of a filmstar CM!
So, evidently nothing’s wrong with the South!! Electing filmstars as chief ministers has little to do with political knowledge or the lack of it! There are a lot of other forces and factors involved in it, more than what meets our eyes. So the only question left unanswered now is, will or can Chiranjeevi emulate NTR? Well, only time will tell us that. He definitely doesn’t have much of public opinion to ride on, like what NTR did at the time of his ascent. For now we can only wish Chiru luck, and keenly track his political journey.
